Our 2.2 billion common law friends
"Change your thoughts and you change your world"
- Norman Vincent Peale
What is the CGE party?
The Common Ground Educational Party represents a global community committed to providing factual education on societal systems and natural lifestyles. Our mission is to empower individuals with knowledge and foster unity by finding common ground among diverse perspectives. We emphasize the necessity of establishing a unified system of law and language to effectively address enduring societal challenges.
Our party critiques existing legal and political structures, particularly highlighting the presence of the electoral commission within a private corporation in the City of London. Moreover, we assert that corporations operate under the Roman civil code, which is entrenched in the legal system of the European Union.
Despite our name, the Common Ground Educational Party is not a conventional political entity. Rather, we prioritize education over traditional political activities. Our goal is to equip individuals with the understanding and tools needed to navigate complex societal issues and advocate for meaningful change.
In summary, our party stands as a beacon for factual education, unity, and empowerment. We believe that by fostering a deeper understanding and consensus on fundamental principles, we can collectively pave the way towards a more harmonious and equitable society.
A notable observation can be made by visiting the Company’s House website and examining the registration status of politicians and political parties, revealing that they are registered as limited liability corporations. This signifies a departure from the traditional understanding of politicians operating within the framework of the English common law system as human beings.
It’s crucial to recognize the distinction between legality and lawfulness. Legal and lawful are not synonymous terms; rather, they represent different aspects of the legal landscape. Similarly, distinctions exist among cash, currency, and money, indicating nuances that are often overlooked or misunderstood.
Furthermore, within the realm of law, there are varying classifications for individuals, such as citizens, subjects, or human beings. Each designation carries its own legal implications, underscoring the complexity of legal language and its potential for misinterpretation.
This situation underscores a broader issue: the need for a deeper understanding of legal concepts among the general populace. Too often, individuals operate within a legal framework they do not fully comprehend, leading to misunderstandings and potential injustices.
To address these challenges, it is essential for the English people to adhere to what is lawful, rather than merely what is legal. However, achieving this goal requires a departure from the current legal system and a return to traditional common law principles.
In summary, the observation regarding politicians’ registration as corporations and the broader issues surrounding legal terminology underscore the need for increased legal literacy and a return to traditional common law principles to ensure a more just and equitable society.
We start by referencing a map illustrating the legal systems across Europe, with Great British common law depicted in blue, Scotland showcasing a combination of common law and civil law in half-red, and Ireland’s alignment with EU law due to its membership. This visual representation highlights the diversity of legal frameworks within the region.
The narrative then shifts to the aftermath of Brexit, with a focus on Scotland’s response. Nicola Sturgeon’s statement asserting Scotland’s European identity and intention to pursue independence to rejoin the EU underscores the shifting political dynamics post-Brexit.
A significant consequence of Brexit mentioned is the relocation of corporations to Ireland. This trend is attributed to Ireland’s EU membership status, which potentially grants these corporations greater influence over legal matters, thus prompting concerns about Ireland becoming a mediator between the UK and the EU, thereby introducing new legal jurisdictions and regulations.
The passage concludes with a reference to Rishi Sunak’s speech in Ireland, suggesting acknowledgment of Ireland’s evolving role in the post-Brexit landscape and its potential impact on legal and economic matters.
In summary, the passage provides insights into the legal ramifications of Brexit, particularly concerning Scotland’s aspirations for EU membership and the growing influence of Ireland within the changing legal landscape of Europe.
As one gains insight into the complexities of legal and societal frameworks, a shift in perspective towards politicians occurs. They are likened to “old slave traders,” suggesting a perception of manipulation and exploitation. The passage underscores politicians’ role in the current societal predicament and questions their ability to lead us out of it.
Furthermore, it challenges individuals to reassess their perceptions of the system, cautioning against blind acceptance of conventional beliefs. It advocates for a vigilant approach, urging individuals to treat every word with respect and to avoid using unfamiliar terminology that could potentially compromise their rights.
The passage proposes a solution through the rectification of contracts, advocating for the establishment of accountable local representatives who align with the will of the people. This shift aims to curtail politicians’ ability to make unilateral decisions, particularly regarding matters as significant as warfare, without the explicit consent of the populace.
Education is presented as a key tool in empowering the masses and fostering a more informed society. By dismantling barriers to information and promoting transparency, the passage suggests that society can hold politicians accountable and prevent them from operating outside the confines of the law.
In essence, the passage underscores the importance of critical thinking, legal literacy, and active engagement in shaping the societal landscape. It advocates for a reevaluation of power dynamics and a commitment to upholding democratic principles for the betterment of society as a whole.
Britains Treasure Islands – 14-part documentary – 2016
JFK speech that got him killed – 1961 – Nufffrespect – 2007
RSA – Sir Ken Robinson – Schools kill creativity- 2011
Ren – Britains Bittersweet Symphony – 2023
The CGE Party represents a vibrant and diverse community, drawing individuals from all walks of life who share a common goal: to revitalize England by returning to the principles of old English traditional common law. England, historically regarded as a pillar of law, has served as a beacon of inspiration for nations worldwide.
Central to the party’s ethos is the belief in the inherent virtues of English law, which include fostering good morals, honesty, accountability, and the pursuit of facts and true freedom. These principles, rooted in the traditions of English law, have historically guided societal conduct and facilitated harmonious relationships.
The passage reflects on the contrast between past and present generations, lamenting the perceived loss of direction and moral compass in contemporary society. It juxtaposes the steadfast commitment of past generations, epitomized by lifelong partnerships and a sense of honor and dignity, with the perceived laxity and moral decay prevalent in modern times.
Ultimately, the CGE Party aspires to instill a sense of responsibility and reverence for traditional values, advocating for a return to the principles that once defined English society. Through education and advocacy, the party seeks to empower individuals to uphold these values and work towards a future characterized by integrity, accountability, and respect for the law.
In summary, the passage encapsulates the CGE Party’s vision of a revitalized England founded upon the timeless principles of old English traditional common law, with the aim of fostering a society grounded in moral integrity and respect for tradition.
Since the 1600s, England has engaged in contractual agreements with nations worldwide, facilitating mutual understanding and communication by promoting the use of English in business dealings. The adoption of the English system of contracts was seen as advantageous for other nations, as it ensured fairness and equality in business transactions, thereby making slavery unfeasible.
During periods of slavery, individuals escaping bondage in America and other regions sought refuge in English jurisdictions where they were afforded safety and protection. This aspect is likened to a scene from the film “John Wick,” where safety is found upon touching certain steps, underscoring the notion that English jurisdictions provided sanctuary for those fleeing oppression.
It’s important to acknowledge the historical context, recognizing the fear and peril faced by black individuals during this time. Despite these challenges, the passage highlights the efforts made by English ancestors to combat slavery and provide refuge for those in need.
In essence, the passage underscores the role of English contractual systems in promoting fairness and equality, as well as the historical significance of English jurisdictions as havens for those seeking liberation from oppression.
England is credited as the sole nation to have effectively abolished slavery worldwide. The widespread adoption of the English language is attributed to England’s commitment to abolishing slavery and its subsequent efforts to disseminate knowledge and skills globally. Rather than enslaving populations, England prioritized education, teaching individuals to read and write in English.
This dissemination of language and knowledge played a significant role in the establishment of the British Empire. Through the spread of English language and education, England facilitated communication and collaboration across cultures, contributing to the growth and influence of the empire.
Contrary to popular belief, the passage asserts that English people never actively engaged in the slave trade. Instead, it points to other entities such as the London corporation, Rome, and New Amsterdam/New York, and their associated corporations, as the primary perpetrators of the slave trade. The passage identifies New Amsterdam, particularly Wall Street, USA, as the site of the first slave market.
Look at what the Dutch slavery page says on WIKI, and what their mentality is towards people. Don’t forget, corporations all use Roman law, now think about that for a second and compare owners of corporations to slave traders. We also must not forget that the last slave trading empire was the Dutch and Belgians. Who created the EU? Where is the international court of Justice where people come to the Roman slave traders for justice? Can you see the false sense of security?
Legal issue- What the Dutch say and think about slavery
Slavery is a social phenomenon in which persons are owned by another person. Slaves are therefore subject to property law. Not every society has established that right of ownership in the same way, but the approach is the same. Slavery has existed all over the world. The fact that slave owners had the right to treat slaves in a certain way did not necessarily mean that this was also accepted by society. Branding in the face, for example, was legalized by the Romans, but was considered immoral.
In (medieval) Europe, slaves were distinguished from serfs , serfs and freemen . Each of these can be seen as another step on a scale towards what is called a free person. It is not the case that these steps were also made that way. It is more that a person was classified into one of these groups depending on his rights.
History of Dutch slavery source:https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschiedenis_van_de_Nederlandse_slavernij
Can you see how they justify it? They don’t implicate themselves, however, the Dutch are the Holy Roman Empire, my mother is Roman Catholic, and the Romans branded their slaves on their faces, and the Dutch are the Romans. Think brothels, coffee shops, Bitcoin, and the Dark web, it is a criminal slave trading empire using a legal system to evade real law that can hold them accountable.
Did you think the British owned America? They declared independence and are run by the Dutch who uses them to deregulate the world. That is why Biden and the EU want a war with Russia and Zalensky recently met with the Dutch Royals, the Prime minister, and the Belgian Prime minister. He also met with the Dutch military. If you happened to have watched Grand Tour with Jeremy Clarkson, they went to Norway and the Dutch military was there preparing. Then we had the Nord Stream pipeline bombing shortly after.
In 1668 the London Royals and the Dutch joined houses and renamed New Amsterdam calling it New York to hide its true significance. What they are doing is called gaslighting, acting like nothing in our system has changed. It is the same when politicians say we are going to war to create peace while lying in the process. It is the opposite of what they mean, they’re also known to use doublespeak.
Doublespeak is a language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms, in which case it is primarily meant to make the truth sound more palatable. It may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning. Wikipedia
Gaslighting is the subjective experience of having one’s reality repeatedly questioned by another.[1][2][3] A colloquialism, the term derives from the title of the 1944 American film Gaslight, which was based on the 1938 British theatre play Gas Light by Patrick Hamilton. However, the term did not gain popular currency in English until the mid-2010s.[4][5] A 2022 Washington Post report described it as a “trendy buzzword” that is “often used incorrectly by people referring to simple disagreements … that don’t meet gaslighting’s historical definition”, leading to expert concerns about the term becoming diluted
Currently, there are 2 types of contracts being used around the world. One of them is used in facts by human beings and one is a legal fiction based on the fiction, the corporation. English traditional common law and Roman Uniform commercial code (UCC). Many of you will have no idea that two conflicting systems are being used against us and how we used to engage with each other in contracts has changed after we joined the EU. If you look up any chart on house prices, inflation, government debt, drug addiction, resources depleted, and animals extinct, it all happened in the ’70s when England lost its power to hold people accountable and with free reign, all corporations plundered the planet and here we are today, a catastrophe waiting to happen, fear, fear, fear. Enough is enough.
Because of this, we aim to unite over 2.2 billion globally who had adopted our laws and share our true history of a time when we collaborated using a fair system of contracts. If you want to live a normal life without corruption, fraud, and deceit, and have every single human being accountable in law to answer for their crimes then traditional common law is the only way to do that. There is no in-between. You either stay in this system that will bleed you dry of resources, wealth and land. Or, you carry on reading and become a part of the modern revolution.
Our society has undergone a transformation that favors the wealthy, with little to no accountability. Through legal study, we’ve uncovered a means to reverse this trend and reclaim our land and resources from unaccountable corporations. In the eyes of common law, land belongs to the people of England, and its ownership is maintained through physical stewardship, not commercial transactions. This principle, if reinstated, would curb foreign land acquisitions, preventing entities from China, Russia, and Dubai from inflating rental prices by purchasing properties for exorbitant rates.
Furthermore, reinstating this principle would address the issue of vacant homes and discourage the ownership of second homes unless actively maintained. In our legal system, corporations lack the capacity to appear in court with a jury, rendering them unable to assert claims to land. In England, juries comprised of ordinary citizens determine guilt or innocence, while judges merely officiate and sentence. However, the introduction of magistrate courts without juries has created a venue where most fines are civil rather than criminal.
To circumvent this, corporations have devised a parallel legal system rooted in Equity law, derived from Roman law. This system, utilized by the law society and extending to corporations, government bodies, banks, and even the Royal family, places individuals at a disadvantage. Legal representation is necessary within this system, resulting in frequent losses against corporations who commit crimes with impunity. Moreover, government decisions often contradict electoral promises, rendering common law contracts null and void. Yet, the Uniform Commercial Code permits minor alterations to contracts, allowing the government to evade accountability.
Addressing these systemic injustices necessitates legal and legislative reforms, as well as public discourse aimed at restoring fairness, transparency, and accountability. Collaboration with legal experts and community organizations is vital in pursuing meaningful change.
Prof. Josh Blackman – Property law – 2018
Common law and corporations – 2009
Our rights as human beings – The Law movement – 2011
The current system often feels alienating and unfair to everyday individuals like you and me. Consider giants like Amazon and Netflix; they operate without human attributes. Initially, they offer services we eagerly sign up for, only to later alter terms or hike prices. This disregards our initial investment and the expectation of consistent service. However, as mentioned, it’s a different system.
Digging deeper, historical research reveals that Dutch slave traders pioneered corporations, insurance firms, and debt/futures trading. Today, we find ourselves entrenched in a debt-centric economy, seemingly beholden to corporations. Insurance companies wield significant policy influence, while banks dilute currency, driving up living costs to untenable levels. Our lives are controlled by currency, debt, fear, corporate power, media influence, and inflation, leading to exorbitant housing and food expenses.
Just wait until the Dutch healthcare system takes root in the UK; many will suffer while only the wealthy receive proper treatment. It’s already underway, with the NHS claiming they can’t cope and turning to private providers like Nuffield Health, at triple the cost. Instead of shelling out for private treatment, why not hire more staff? Can’t you see the scam?
I speak from experience as a Dutch citizen who lived in Holland for 19 years, working as a self-employed artisan block paver in some of North Holland’s finest areas. From Haarlem to Amsterdam, I’ve seen it firsthand. In Avenhorn, we even laid the first road with underfloor heating for OOMS tarmac company. Moving between Holland and England, I can’t help but notice the Dutch system being imposed on the English, just as it was forced upon us. I’m witnessing history repeat itself.
In 2006, while working in block paving, I experienced a collapsed lung. Despite having disability insurance, which cost £250 per month, I faced a frustrating ordeal. The policy stipulated that injuries lasting less than six weeks wouldn’t be covered. However, I needed to stay home for 12 weeks due to my injury. Despite paying three installments, the insurance company, Fortis ASR Bank, refused to honor the contract, claiming I wasn’t insured. Pursuing legal action in Holland proved daunting and costly, as legal aid is virtually non-existent and court battles require substantial funds.
This incident left me in significant debt, despite my efforts to protect myself by obtaining insurance. Similar frustrations arose with other insurance policies, such as mobile phone insurance, where the company alleged tampering with the device to avoid coverage. Feeling disillusioned, I abandoned block paving and transitioned to become a plumbing and heating engineer, eventually relocating back to England in 2012 to advocate for justice.
In Holland, in 2011, I faced another challenge when diagnosed with cancer, necessitating costly medical treatments. Compulsory health insurance imposed additional financial burdens, including hefty excess fees and high monthly premiums. Despite battling cancer and enduring intensive radiation therapy, the financial strain persisted. Even during illness, the threat of bailiffs and relentless letters compounded the stress, highlighting the unforgiving nature of the system.
Did you know that in Holland, if you fall ill, you’re entitled to receive your full wage for two years, which then reduces to 70% of your last wage thereafter? Additionally, individuals can accumulate benefits over time, allowing them to remain off work for extended periods. For instance, my sister could have sustained her last wage for up to four years following her job loss, thanks to her accrued benefits. This stark contrast challenges the perception that the EU champions equality. Historical legacies, such as King Leopold II’s brutal reign in the Congo and the Dutch VOC’s involvement in the slave trade, underscore the complex realities.
In England, the legal principle requires an injured party to make a claim. However, the insurance industry often unfairly targets young drivers, penalizing them with exorbitant rates before they’ve even driven a mile. This disparity becomes evident in documentaries like “Inside Job,” narrated by Matt Damon, which exposes the culpability of bankers in the 2008 financial crash. Bankers had hedged themselves with insurance on fraudulent contracts, ensuring massive profits when people inevitably defaulted on mortgages during economic downturns. Consequently, insurance premiums skyrocket, not due to individuals like Barry making modest claims, but because of systemic manipulation by those in positions of power.
Despite this, there persists a societal tendency to mistrust individuals like Barry while extending unwarranted respect to those in suits, despite their recurrent betrayals. This phenomenon prompts reflection on whether it’s akin to Stockholm syndrome.
For too long, we’ve allowed ourselves to be led blindly, failing to question and seek the truth. The information has always been available, yet we’ve been content to follow without scrutiny. In their world of power and domination, ignorance is not bliss; it’s a tool they wield to control every aspect of our lives. They thrive on our lack of awareness, but ignorance is no defense in the eyes of the law. It’s time we open our eyes, ask questions, and reclaim our autonomy.
Ignorantia juris non excusat – In law, ignorantia juris non excusat, or ignorantia legis neminem excusat, is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content. Wikipedia
For further validation, I encourage you to watch the initial episode of Wind in the Willows provided below. Notice the inscription “Ignorantia Legis Neminem Excusat” on the Queen’s bench, written in Roman Latin, within the courtroom setting. Pay close attention to the dialogue between the magistrate and the police officer Fatface regarding Toad. You can skip ahead to the indicated timestamp in the video for pertinent context.
One day, reminiscing about childhood memories, I decided to revisit Wind in the Willows as an adult. Intrigued by a familiar phrase inscribed on the Queen’s bench, “Ignorantia Legis Neminem Excusat,” I delved into its meaning, spurred by my knowledge of Latin and studies in law. Reflecting on this revelation, I wondered if such concepts were ever taught in schools—how we’re expected to adhere to laws we may never have been informed of. Serendipitously, these chance encounters with profound insights gradually unraveled a narrative of factual evidence, shedding light on the reality of our world. Feeling compelled to share this knowledge, our aim is to empower you—the people—to reclaim ownership of power and wealth. Through our research and insights into legal principles like the law of reversion by Sir Edward Coke, as expounded in Coke upon Littleton, we offer a path forward towards reclaiming what rightfully belongs to you.
The Institutes of the Lawes of England is a series of legal treatises written by Sir Edward Coke. They were first published, in stages, between 1628 and 1644.
We’ve essentially become part of a maritime enterprise, akin to crew members on a ship or subjects of the Crown corporation, which has been administered within the private confines of the City of London Corporation since the 1600s. This concept is meticulously detailed in my 114-page essay, which traverses 1000 years of English history and law, available in PDF format and soon to be elucidated in a forthcoming video. Click here to access and download it.
If you harbor doubts about this website, my credibility, or my motives for engaging your attention, consider this: why would I invest over 17 years researching and constructing a website solely to disseminate information without purpose? Am I perceived as irrational?
All I request is for you to peruse the descriptions accompanying each video shared below and scrutinize the speakers featured within them. Temporarily set aside any preconceptions and delve into their narratives. I’ve curated the finest documentaries, each verifiable, which is why I exclusively share these videos with you. In many instances, you’ll hear firsthand accounts directly from the sources.
Give each video a brief viewing, perhaps the initial 2 minutes, and I assure you’ll be compelled to watch them through. A revelation awaits, providing a high-definition elucidation of the past 50 years, enabling a comprehensive understanding of how systems operate and potential avenues for action.
We possess the solutions, having found our way out through a straightforward process. By renouncing our status as subjects of the Crown corporation and reclaiming our land under traditional common law, corporations would be obliged to provide everything freely, as foreigners on our lands, reverting the system to its original state. We can demand compensation for damages inflicted upon our land, safeguarded within a land trust held by the Royals. Once we reclaim the land, damages will be paid in gold, elucidating the reason for taxes levied on all transactions, with the stored gold representing our inheritance.
In common law, transparency and factual accuracy are paramount, yet tangible assets like gold and silver coins have been supplanted by counterfeit fiat currency, merely a promissory note as indicated on your banknote. Consider examining a tenner, twenty, fifty, or a five-pound note.
Am I the sole challenger of this system, grappling with these complexities throughout my life? We’re witnessing a surge of individuals rising to confront the status quo, many with far greater influence than I. I am merely a concerned citizen, endeavoring to make sense of the prevailing injustices.
Aligned with fellow Canadians like esteemed clinical psychologist, public speaker, and scholar, Dr. Jordan Peterson, who lauds England for championing free speech and freedom of thought worldwide. He fearlessly stands against injustice and offers a plethora of insightful lectures available for free on YouTube—worth exploring!
Why I Love Great Britain
Dr. Peterson’s discussions are unfolding in the global public sphere, resonating with the widespread censorship of information perpetrated by governmental and corporate entities seeking to suppress discussions about the chaos they sow. By restricting our ability to communicate through technological bans, they aim to garner support for implementing new laws that restrict our freedoms. Governments and corporations promulgate policies reinforcing this madness, branding dissent as hate crimes.
Shouldn’t crimes be grounded in factual evidence?
Isn’t it the government’s duty to foster unity among its people, rather than exacerbating division? We observe fundamental flaws within our system that defy logic.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, Australian adherents of English common law are reclaiming their fundamental rights and liberties under threat. While Americans reshape their nation, caution is warranted against adopting a corrupt and self-serving American-style common law. This caution stems from their historical propensity for aggression against other nations, despite sharing our language while introducing alterations in spelling. (More on this later)
Over the past two decades, diverse global communities have collaborated, sharing knowledge and information in a concerted effort to awaken the world from its slumber. Together, we can dispel the encroaching darkness threatening our natural way of life. Thanks to individuals like you, we are making strides towards victory!
What is so great about England?
England is special, well to me it is anyway. Our engineering capabilities are unmatched by any country on the planet. We built the best and biggest ships and the fastest cars, we transformed the world by being able to melt steel, build steam engines from scratch, helicopters that can fly upside down, jet engines, hovercraft, computers, the internet, the arms processor in your laptop and mobile phone, the unbreakable glass now on that phone, colour TV. All of what you use today has some kind of English engineering in it. We used to make products that would last your lifetime and would rarely break down. If it would break down it was always easy to fix it yourself.
This is why England must be protected!
We never used to be overworked and underpaid slaving away for corporations as we do now. All they do is lie and cheat for maximum profit at the expense of destroying us and nature with it. There was a time when we all used to own the companies together in our real names, doing real honest business that benefitted everyone. It brought a natural balance and removed the possibility of being defrauded.
We invented sports we could play at all ages to have fun during times we weren’t at work. We invented rounders, hockey, football, cricket, snooker, bowls, rugby, and golf. These games have all gone global with great success.
We used to invent, tinker and have the freedom to create whatever our imagination thought up to bring real joy to our lives with each other when we had enough land to do so.
The community spirit we had and the way we looked after one another. Not this competition-driven society where you trample over everyone to get what you want.
My message to the people of England:
“We are the pioneers, the engineers of the past and the engineers of the future!”
Where did we go wrong?
How have we ended up in a world where people get away with lying and manipulating each other without any real consequences? With a government refusing the will of the people, changing their manifesto and trying to overturn a vote they didn’t agree with?
Products breaking after the guarantee? 1-year EU warranties?
EU emissions scandals while destroying our car industry that couldn’t keep up with the fraud.
Bad practices, no oversight or building regulations on new-build properties, causing leaks, bad installs and terrible community-designed housing estates based on profit and not people’s needs.
PPI? Off-shore bank accounts? Shell companies? Limited companies supported by the Queen?
How are bankers and the law society able to create manipulating contracts to steal trillions and then pay themselves bonuses?
How have we ended up with a self-serving Royal family that favours large corporations, the joining of a corrupt E.U institution (We can prove it) and the evading of the law by her own corporations?
Nothing makes sense until you start looking for the answers.
Knowing what we have discovered will not only change our lives for the better, there is nothing anyone can do to stop what is coming. We would like to present all the facts to you and show you that there is another way to live our lives which is more equal and fair and removes the ability for corruption and fraud which would eliminate most of the problems we face today. We have a choice!
We can own our land for free just by putting in a claim, we can be debt-free and claim back the land and wealth taken from the English people. This law is applicable in 192 countries which means the natives of other countries can use the same method. It’s international law.
Which is why we must protect England!
Everything is currently on loan to the Queen and her corporations because we gave up our rights as human beings and become her subject/employee liable for taxes and anything these people dream up. Making it possible for them to operate above the very laws they create making us incompetent, rather than serving the people. Creating currency out of thin air to enrich themselves off the backs of hardworking people. Modern-day self inflicted slavery. It’s very clever.
Unknowingly, we have subscribed to a system that has turned us into a foreigner on our own lands and it was done by deceit. We believe it’s time for us to come home once again and claim what is rightfully ours in law.
The question is, are you ready to join us and do something about it?
This will take some time on your part as there are a lot of different twists and turns to connect the dots, but we show you the facts and explain why they are relevant and we offer you the books and information for you to see for yourself and make up your own mind. All free of charge!
Why should you join the CGE Party?
We wanted to create a place where we can come together and find all the evidence in one spot and that is why this website has been created.
We offer you documentaries made by experts and scholars who offer their experience and whistleblowers who speak up about the violent organisations and corruption going on. These can be found by scrolling further down the page or you can find them in our documentaries section.
With everything going on recently, I’m sure you can see the world is waking up around you and this is something we started back in 2007. So, if you want to skip the fake news nonsense that started in 2016, and you want pure facts and a way out of this dreadful system and build a new community? Then you have come to the right place.
Let’s build a better future together, and show the world what England is really made of, rather than argue with each other and divide ourselves. We are England, we are English, and we are proud.
Join us today on Youtube where we will be uploading new videos every week explaining what we have discovered and offer you a platform where you are free to comment on the videos and ask questions so it’s easier for us to interact and less work for me running a forum, which can quickly grow out of control. For me, It’s the smarter way of doing things to achieve the same goals.
Thank you for your time, if you made it this far. Please look below for the list of documentaries we recommend to get you started, and we hope to see you soon on our new channel! Click here and subscribe now!
Four Horsemen by Renegade inc
Four Horsemen is a 2012 British documentary film directed by Ross Ashcroft. The film criticises the system of fractional reserve banking, debt-based economy and political lobbying by banks, which it regards as a serious threat to Western civilisation. It criticises the War on Terror, which it maintains is not fought to eliminate al-Qaeda and other militant organizations, but to create larger debt to the banks.
As an alternative, the film promotes a return to classical economics and the gold standard. Among those interviewed are Joseph Stiglitz, former chief economist at the World Bank; Noam Chomsky, linguistics professor; John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man; ecological economist and steady-state theorist Herman Daly, formerly at the World Bank; and Max Keiser, TV host and former trader. The film was released in the United Kingdom on 14 March 2012.[1] A book based on the film has been published.
Mike Maloney - Hidden secrets of money part 1 and 4
Who owns the Federal Reserve? How does the Federal Reserve work? You are about to learn one of the biggest secrets in the history of the world… it’s a secret that has huge effects for everyone who lives on this planet.
Most people can feel deep down that something isn’t quite right with the world economy, but few know what it is. Gone are the days where a family can survive on just one paycheck… every day it seems that things are more and more out of control, yet only one in a million understand why.
You are about to discover the system that is ultimately responsible for most of the inequality in our world today. The powers that be DO NOT want you to know about this, as this system is what has kept them at the top of the financial food-chain for the last 100 years. Learning this will change your life, because it will change the choices that you make. If enough people learn it, it will change the world… because it will change the system .
For this is the biggest Hidden Secret Of Money. Never in human history have so many been plundered by so few, and it’s all accomplished through this… The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind.
Sir Ken Robinson - Changing education paradigm
Creativity expert Sir Ken Robinson challenged the way we educate our children, championing a radical rethink of how our school systems cultivate creativity and acknowledge multiple types of intelligence.
In this talk from RSA Animate, Sir Ken Robinson lays out the link between 3 troubling trends: rising drop-out rates, schools’ dwindling stake in the arts, and ADHD. An important, timely talk for parents and teachers.
The lightbulb conspiracy - planned obsolescence
The Light Bulb Conspiracy goes on to show how many early incandescent lightbulbs lasted upwards of 2,500 hours. But then the leading manufacturers of the time formed an international cartel whose ostensible goal was to standardize the lightbulb.
Phoebus cartel
The Phoebus cartel existed to control the manufacture and sale of incandescent light bulbs. They appropriated market territories and fixed the useful life of such bulbs.[1] Corporations based in Europe and America founded the cartel on January 15, 1925 in Geneva.[2] Phoebus based itself in Switzerland. The corporation named itself Phœbus S.A. Compagnie Industrielle pour le Développement de l’Éclairage (French for “Phoebus, Inc. Industrial Company for the Development of Lighting”).They had intended the cartel to last for thirty years (1925 to 1955).
Inside Job
Inside Job is a 2010 American documentary film, directed by Charles Ferguson, about the late-2000s financial crisis. Ferguson, who began researching in 2008,[3] says the film is about “the systemic corruption of the United States by the financial services industry and the consequences of that systemic corruption”.[4] In five parts, the film explores how changes in the policy environment and banking practices helped create the financial crisis.
The global financial meltdown that took place in Fall 2008 caused millions of job and home losses and plunged the United States into a deep economic recession. Matt Damon narrates a documentary that provides a detailed examination of the elements that led to the collapse and identifies keys financial and political players. Director Charles Ferguson conducts a wide range of interviews and traces the story from the United States to China to Iceland to several other global financial hot spots.
The Corporation
The documentary shows the development of the contemporary business corporation, from a legal entity that originated as a government-chartered institution meant to affect specific public functions to the rise of the modern commercial institution entitled to most of the legal rights of a person. The documentary concentrates mostly upon North American corporations, especially those in the United States.
The Corporation examines and criticizes corporate business practices. The film’s assessment is affected via the diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV; Robert D. Hare, a University of British Columbia psychology professor and a consultant to the FBI, compares the profile of the contemporary profitable business corporation to that of a clinically diagnosed psychopath (however, Hare has objected to the manner in which his views are portrayed in the film; see “Critical reception” below).
The Corporation attempts to compare the way corporations are systematically compelled to behave with what it claims are the DSM-IV’s symptoms of psychopathy, e.g., the callous disregard for the feelings of other people, the incapacity to maintain human relationships, the reckless disregard for the safety of others, the deceitfulness (continual lying to deceive for profit), the incapacity to experience guilt, and the failure to conform to social norms and respect the law.
The New Corporation
The Corporation (2003) examined an institution within society; #TheNewCorporation reveals a world now fully remade in the corporation’s image, perilously close to losing democracy. We trace the devastating consequences, connecting the dots between then and now, and inspire with stories of resistance and change from around the world.
Dutch East India Slave traders (EU) - Crashcourse world history 229
Join host John Green to learn about the Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie, doing business as the VOC, also known as the Dutch East India Company. In the 16th and 17th centuries, the Dutch managed to dominate world trade, and they did so through the pioneering use of corporations and finance. However, not all of their ways were new; traditional methods such as violently enforced monopolies, unfair trade agreements, and warfare also played a role in their growth. You’ll learn how the Dutch came up with inventions including joint stock corporations, maritime insurance, and futures trading… and how all this affected the US economy in 2008.
Sensitive: This resource contains material that may be sensitive for some students. Teachers should exercise discretion in evaluating whether this resource is suitable for their class.
John Harris It's an illusion 2 - BCG
Police commisioner Anthony Stansfield ITNJ
ANTHONY STANSFELD is the Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner in the United Kingdom (with parliamentary privilege). He is the first person to hold the post and was elected on 15 November 2012.
For 10 years they knew about the fraud and for 10 years they had gone for the personal guarantees of the people they had knowingly defrauded, and this bankrupted thousands of people. They had their houses taken away, their homes….people committed suicide, there were divorces. Sheer misery it caused. The bank chairmen were perfectly aware of it because they were written to by so many victims, and it simply wasn’t followed up.
Dean Clifford on Trust Law and Sovereignty
Dean Clifford is a sovereignty guru who teaches his Youtube students that the whole dynamic of the court room process can have a dramatic change by understanding and asserting your rights under Trust Law, and changing the presumptions surrounding this.
Dean Clifford, Sovereignty, and Trust Law:
Dean teaches that the legal person of the STRAWMAN (the ALL CAPS JOHN H DOE name) is a Public TRUST; and he teaches about the different roles of this trust and that these roles can be inverted at any time if you decide to claim that and do so.
The Grantor is your parents who gave birth to the birth certificates ESTATE/STRAWMAN from the moment they registered the birth of the child, put his or her footprints, height, and weight on the application form, and handed the registration and application over to the STATE c/o Vital Statistics. This created a LEGAL PERSON, or a corporation that that living person has, by default, been doing business through.
Gordon Bowden at the Itnj
Gordon Bowden speaking at the International tribunal for natural justice regarding 260,000 shell corporations being registered to one London address. 788-790 Finchley Road
Britains real monarch
Britain’s Real Monarch is an historical documentary presented by Tony
Robinson first shown on Channel 4 on 3 January 2004. It has also been
broadcast in the UK, America and Australia. This documentary argued that all
British monarchs since Henry VII of England did not have a valid claim
to the English throne.
If Edward were indeed illegitimate, then he and his descendants would have had no valid claim to the throne, so the programme suggests that the ‘real’ monarchs were the heirs of his legitimate brother George, Duke of Clarence. At the time, this line was represented by The 14th Earl of Loudoun (who usually styled himself simply as Michael Hastings), who had emigrated to Australia in 1960, married, fathered five children, and lived in Jerilderie, New South Wales, until his death in June 2012.[3] He would be succeeded in this by his son Simon Abney-Hastings, 15th Earl of Loudoun.
Britain on the brink - European union
The gap between rich and poor - The divide
The Divide tells the story of 7 individuals striving for a better life in modern day US and UK – where the top 0.1% owns as much wealth as the bottom 90%. By plotting these tales together, we uncover how every aspect of our lives is controlled by one factor: the size of the gap between rich and poor. This isn’t based on real life. This is real life.
Wall Street psychologist Alden wants to make it to the top 1%; KFC worker Leah from Richmond, Virginia just wants to make it through the day; Jen in Sacramento, California doesn’t even talk to the neighbours in her upscale gated community – they’ve made it clear to her she isn’t “their kind”.
By weaving these stories with news archive from 1979 to the present day, The Divide creates a lyrical, psychological and tragi-comic picture of how economic division creates social division. It serves as both a call to arms, and a powerful warning. The film is inspired by the critically-acclaimed, best-selling book “The Spirit Level” by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett.
Titanic The Shocking Truth
Everyone knows the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank on her maiden voyage. However, this film provides evidence that it was not the Titanic that sank, but Titanic was switched for its sister ship the Olympic. The Olympic was damaged badly when it struck the warship the HMS Hawke. The Olympic’s damage was so serious it could not pass inspection. What transpired was an insurance fraud.
What In The World Are They Spraying?
The Geo-Engineering Coverup Revealed. By now everyone has seen crisscrossing streaks of white clouds trailing behind jet aircraft, stretching from horizon to horizon, eventually turning the sky into a murky haze. Our innate intelligence tells us these are not mere vapor trails from jet engines, but no one yet has probed the questions: who is doing this and why.
With the release of this video, all of that has changed. Here is the story of a rapidly developing industry called geo-engineering, driven by scientists, corporations, and governments intent on changing global climate, controlling the weather, and altering the chemical composition of soil and water — all supposedly for the betterment of mankind.
Although officials insist that these programs are only in the discussion phase, evidence is abundant that they have been underway since about 1990 — and the effect has been devastating to crops, wildlife, and human health. We are being sprayed with toxic substances without our consent and, to add insult to injury, they are lying to us about it. Do not watch this documentary if you have high blood pressure.
Thrive: What on Earth Will It Take?
An unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what’s really going on in our world by following the money upstream – uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.
7/7 Ripple Effect 2 - London bombing
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple Effect, the film-maker Muad’Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Loose change 2005
Loose Change is a series of films released between 2005 and 2009 that argue in favor of certain conspiracies relating to the September 11 attacks. The films were written and directed by Dylan Avery and produced by Korey Rowe, Jason Bermas, and Matthew Brown.
Coverage of the film increased in 2006 with the recut release having airings on U.S. and European television stations and over 4 million views online in four months,[5] leading Vanity Fair to say it could be the first Internet blockbuster.[6] Loose Change asserts that the usual account of the Pentagon attack, World Trade Center collapse and United 93 phone calls and crash is implausible and instead suggests the 9/11 attacks were a false flag operation.
Out of shadows
Out Of Shadows claims to lift the mask on how the mainstream media and Hollywood manipulate and control the masses by spreading propaganda throughout their content. The goal is to wake up the general public by attempting to shed light on how we all may have been lied to and potentially brainwashed by a “hidden” enemy with an apparently sinister agenda. This project was the result of almost two years of blood, sweat, and tears by a team of self proclaimed “woke professionals”. It’s been independently produced and funded and is available on many different platforms for free for anyone to watch. Donations keep our team fed and clothed.Written by outofshadows.org
Zeitgeist - The Movie
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Zeitgeist: Addendum attempts to locate the root causes of the pervasive social corruption, while also offering a solution. This solution is not based on politics, morality, laws, or any other “establishment” notions of human affairs, but rather on a modern, non-superstitious based understanding of what we are and how we align with nature, to which we are a part of. The work advocates a new social system which is updated to present day knowledge, highly influenced by the life long work of Jacque Fresco and The Venus Project. Written by Elshan Hasanov