Do you believe the story told by the American government and the worlds media that 2 planes brought down 3 buildings on the Sept 11th attack in 2001? Or, are you sceptical and would like to know more about it?
We are going to dive into all of the facts that played out before the attack and the discoveries we made many years later. This page will share all the evidence we have that show you both sides of the story and we hope this offers you a fair insight into what really happened that day. We know you are smart enough to make up your own minds as long as you have all of the information at hand.
When I got onto the internet in 2003 there were many download programs you could use to get free music and DVDs. Because of this, we were able to download all paid content for free, making it easy to get hold of information without it costing a fortune. Then when Youtube came along we had a free platform to distribute our findings and share them with the world, we could cross-examine with other researchers to get to the bottom of what really happened that dreadful day.
The months leading up to 9/11
William “Bill” Cooper
Locklip.com reports: On his June 28th, 2001 broadcast, he went on to predict 9/11, adding that the U.S. Government would attempt to use Osama bin Laden as a scapegoat:
“I’m telling you be prepared for a major attack! But it won’t be Osama bin Laden. It will be those behind the New World Order… Whatever is going to happen that they are going to blame on Osama bin Laden, DON’T YOU EVEN BELIEVE IT!”
Osama bin Laden was CIA agent Tim Osman and died in 2001 — HERE is the proof.
Less than 11 weeks later, his predictions would turn out to be fatally true. With a critical eye, Cooper examined the tense situation and connected the bits of information from his sources. This allowed him to deconstruct the lies fed to the general public and construct his theory.
Naturally, he was a thorn in the authorities’ spine. In July of 1998, Cooper was charged with tax evasion. A warrant for his arrest was issued but never executed. As a consequence, he was considered one of America’s major fugitives and became a prime target of the U.S. Marshals Service in the year 2000.
Cooper candidly spoke about his situation and became convinced he was being actively targeted by President Clinton’s administration and the IRS. After the tragic events of September 11 unfolded, Cooper’s radio show attempted to expose the the massive conspiracy that led to the attacks.
He pointed his finger at the Federal Government, accusing the authorities of planning the terrorist move and duping America’s citizens and the rest of the world into believing a fabricated story. This allowed them to sway public opinion in their favor and execute their plan.
In his final broadcast, on November 5, 2011, Bill Cooper talked about planning to write a book detailing his tour of duty in Vietnam. He said he was dedicating it to everyone who had served during the war.
Later that evening, while he was in his home in Eagar, Arizona, the Apache County Sheriff’s Department paid him a visit. He had been accused of brandishing a gun around and the police officers had a warrant for his arrest.
However, the officers pulled up in unmarked vehicles, without wearing uniforms, and used trickery to draw him out.
Sources claim the officers positioned themselves in a cul-de-sac often frequented by teenagers who would party and leave trash behind. The officers began making a lot of noise and Cooper came out to confront them, believing they were nothing more than drunken juveniles.
The officers would not identify themselves so Cooper threatened to call the police. As he was heading back inside, shots were fired.
The outcome saw a police officer being killed, but so was Cooper. Nobody knows who fired the first shot and it is unclear whether Bill Cooper carried a gun at the time of his death.
The mystery surrounding Cooper’s death has led many into believing it was not accidental, but rather a carefully planned and executed plot to remove an “undesirable element.”
As events unfolded on 9/11
9/11: How America’s worst terror attack unfolded
On September 11, 2001, 2,973 people died and thousands were injured as two hi-jacked planes flew into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City.
Predicting a Skyscraper’s Collapse | BBC Studios
The terrorist attacks of 9/11 precipitated a chain of unforeseen events as the 110 storeys of the twin towers suddenly collapsed with thousands of occupants inside. Could Professor Torero’s Firegrid technology have predicted the building’s collapse?
BBC News Coverage of September 11th attacks
The evening TV coverage of the New York attacks, about four hours recorded from just after 7pm on 11th September 2001. Includes the Ten O’Clock News, and part of Newsnight.
9/11 third tower mystery ‘solved’
By Mike Rudin
BBC, Conspiracy Files
The final mystery of 9/11 will soon be solved, according to US experts investigating the collapse of the third tower at the World Trade Center.
The 47-storey third tower, known as Tower Seven, collapsed seven hours after the twin towers. Investigators are expected to say ordinary fires on several different floors caused the collapse. Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower was brought down in a controlled demolition. Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was not hit by a plane.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology, based near Washington DC, is expected to conclude in its long-awaited report this month that ordinary fires caused the building to collapse. That would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of fire.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s lead investigator, Dr Shyam Sunder, spoke to BBC Two’s “The Conspiracy Files”: “Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was normal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors that may have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings.”
‘Smoking gun’
However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse is impossible. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue there must have been a controlled demolition.
The founder of the group, Richard Gage, says the collapse of the third tower is an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives. “Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this building falling at virtually freefall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process. “Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance”, says Gage, “they don’t go straight down through themselves.”
Conspiracy theories
There are a number of facts that have encouraged conspiracy theories about Tower Seven.
- Although its collapse potentially made architectural history, all of the thousands of tonnes of steel from the skyscraper were taken away to be melted down.
- The third tower was occupied by the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, which would co-ordinate any response to a disaster or a terrorist attack.
- The destruction of the third tower was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. The first official inquiry into Tower Seven by the Federal Emergency Management Agency was unable to be definitive about what caused its collapse.
- In May 2002 FEMA concluded that the building collapsed because intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of diesel stored in the building. But it said this had “only a low probability of occurrence” and more work was needed.
But now nearly seven years after 9/11 the definitive official explanation of what happened to Tower Seven is finally about to be published in America. The National Institute of Standards and Technology has spent more than two years investigating Tower Seven but lead investigator Dr Shyam Sunder rejects criticism that it has been slow.
“We’ve been at this for a little over two years and doing a two or two and a half year investigation is not at all unusual. That’s the same kind of time frame that takes place when we do aeroplane crash investigations, it takes a few years.” With no steel from Tower 7 to study, investigators have instead made four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail. They’re confident their approach can now provide the answers. Dr Sunder says the investigation is moving as fast as possible.
“It’s a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before.” Other skyscrapers haven’t fully collapsed before because of fire. But NIST argues that what happened on 9/11 was unique.
Steel structure weakened
It says Tower Seven had an unusual design, built over an electricity substation and a subway; there were many fires that burnt for hours; and crucially, fire fighters could not fight the fires in Tower 7, because they didn’t have enough water and focused on saving lives. Investigators have focused on the east side where the long floor spans were under most stress. They think fires burnt long enough to weaken and break many of the connections that held the steel structure together.
Most susceptible were the thinner floor beams which required less fireproofing, and the connections between the beams and the columns. As they heated up the connections failed and the beams sagged and failed, investigators say. The collapse of the first of the Twin Towers does not seem to have caused any serious damage to Tower Seven, but the second collapse of the 1,368ft (417m) North Tower threw debris at Tower Seven, just 350ft (106m) away.
Tower Seven came down at 5.21pm. Until now most of the photographs have been of the three sides of the building that did not show much obvious physical damage. Now new photos of the south side of the building, which crucially faced the North Tower, show that whole side damaged and engulfed in smoke.
My Questions
- Why would Osama Bin Laden attack the biggest military power in the world? What was there to gain?
- How come 4 planes were hijacked and no fighter jets intervened?
- How is it possible that the building hit by the second plane collapsed first?
- How come 3 buildings collapsed due to fires when building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane? Making these the first 3 buildings in history to collapse due to fires?
- Why did all 3 buildings collapse at freefall speed?
Documentaries – Asking questions
Fahrenheit 9/11 – 2004
Directed by Michael Moore, whose aura of controversy only grew after his Oscar acceptance speech at the 2003 Academy Awards, Fahrenheit 9/11, like Moore’s Bowling For Columbine and Roger & Me, promises to expose the corporate wrongdoings and big-money scandals perpetrated by America’s financial elite. This movie, however, looks beyond the inner echelons of General Motors and Lockheed Martin in hopes of outing the evildoers in the White House, particularly in regards to the 43rd President of the United States, George W. Bush.
In addition to criticizing the administration’s handling of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, Moore digs deep into the surprising relationship with the Bin Laden family held by both Bush administrations, and questions whether or not potential Saudi involvement with the attacks has been ignored.
Loose change – 2005
Loose Change is a series of films released between 2005 and 2009 that theorize, based on evidence available about the 9/11 attacks, that it was a planned operation. The films were written and directed by Dylan Avery and produced by Korey Rowe, Jason Bermas, and Matthew Brown.
The original 2005 film was edited and re-released as Loose Change: 2nd Edition (2006), a third time for the 2nd Edition Recut (2006), and then subsequently edited for a fourth time for the HD Remastered Edition (2017). Loose Change: Final Cut, deemed “the third and final release of this documentary series”[1] was released on DVD and Web-streaming format on November 11, 2007.[2][3]
Another version of the film, Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup, released on September 22, 2009, is narrated by Daniel Sunjata and distributed by Microcinema International.[4]
Coverage of the film increased in 2006 with the recut release having airings on U.S. and European television stations and over four million views online in four months,[5] leading Vanity Fair to say it could be the first Internet blockbuster
Loose change final cut – 2007
9/11: Blueprint for Truth – The Architecture of Destruction
WTC7 according to Danny Jowenko was absolutely brought down by a controlled demolition.
The accident of prominent Dutch “demolition expert” Danny Jowenko is of special interest to us, because on July 13th 2011 in an exclusive Press TV interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Veterans Today board member and editor, specifically drew attention to the Dutch demolition expert, Danny Jowenko, stating that two years ago, he came across an extremely disturbing video in which Danny Jowenko was interviewed concerning the collapse on 9/11, of a 3rd World Trade Center building.
WTC7, a 47 storey building, the third tallest building, which was not hit by a plane, which was conspicuously missing in the 9/11 commission report and which according to Danny Jowenko was absolutely brought down by a controlled demolition. “That is, WTC-7 went straight down into its own footprint in seconds without any visible external trauma, which means only some catastrophic internal trauma could have brought it down, concluded Sabrosky.” He has repeatedly cited the well known demolition experts’ views and interview in his recent articles and interviews.
9/11: Dutch Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko Dies In “Car Crash”
9/11 coincidences – Nufffrespect Part 1 to 10
Nufffrespect was one of the first main channels back in 2006 to get deleted by Youtube for sharing controversial information about 911.
The United States of America has an insatiable appetite for conflict, thinks Simon Robson. In ‘What Barry Says’ he tries to explains his views. Since the 50’s, the USA always waged war, tells Robson. This time it’s the war on terrorism. But in Robson’s view it actually is a campaign against the opposition of the US domination of the world, fueled by US weapon manufacturers. Robson calls it war corporatism, a new movement which has captured the US presidency.
9 11 & ISRAEL – ALAN SABROSKY’S SHOCKING PRESS TV INTERVIEW
U.S. Intelligence 9/11 and Iraq: A Whistleblower’s Story
Forensic Engineering World Trade Center 7 | CSI | Forensics Talks Ep12 | ft. Dr. Leroy Hulsey
Bin Laden vs Bush – Who benefits
If we start looking at who benefits from this war then we can clearly see that Bin Laden would have to be insane to want to attack the USA. It led to a major war killing over 363,000 people. Bin Laden lost all of his wealth, his ability to travel, and in the end, he lost his life. Gaining nothing, and losing everything.
The Irish Times
Sun, Sep 16, 2001, 01:00
Osama bin Laden today denied any involvement in last week’s terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.
“The US is pointing the finger at me but I categorically state that I have not done this,” bin Laden said in a statement faxed to the Pakistan-based Afghan Islamic Press (AIP) news agency. “Those who have done it, they have done it in their personal interest,” bin Laden said in the statement, which AIP said had been sent to them by bin Laden aide Abdul Samad.
Bin Laden said he did not have the means to organise terrorist attacks because of restrictions placed on his contacts with the outside world by Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. “I’m living in Afghanistan. I’m a follower of Amir Ul-Momineen (Omar) who does not allow me to participate in such activities,” the statement, written in bin Laden’s native language, Arabic, said.
AIP is a private news agency but has close contacts with the Taliban militia which rules most of Afghanistan. The United States has identified bin Laden as the prime suspect in the investigation into last week’s attacks, which left more than 5,000 people dead.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/bin-laden-denies-involvement-in-us-attacks-1.396894